Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Prudential Securities Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 20, 1998No. 97-5109PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
Appellants John H. Lomax, Ann D. Lo-max, Emory C. Camp, and Robert A. Calle-wart appeal the denial of their motion to intervene in the ongoing enforcement of a consent decree negotiated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Prudential Securities Inc. Under the decree, Prudential provided a “claims resolution process” as an alternative to judicial relief for certain investors whom Prudential had allegedly defrauded. Appellants, former investors, voluntarily submitted their claims to this process and received damage awards, but they then sought to intervene as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-Appellees, Nathaniel McQueen Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Captain Stewart W. Beckett v. Air Line Pilots AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Berger v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Scott J. Rafferty, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Nynex Corporation, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Pure Country, Inc., Doing Business as Pure Country Weavers v. Sigma Chi Fraternity Sigma Chi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Karsner v. LothianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Doe v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.