Legal Opinion

McLaurin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1988No. 53755PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

*342On August 21, 1983, at approximately 4:10 a.m., movant was seen in the house of the victim by two police officers as he attempted to flee. He was arrested at the rear of the house, and four cans of tuna were found in the front pockets of his pants. In the house, 11 cans of beer and a stereo receiver were found on the kitchen table. The victim identified the cans of' tuna, beer, and receiver as her or her daughter’s property. She testified the property was not where it had been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Baker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  2. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Mannon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API