Legal Opinion

Howell v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 22, 2019No. 43/18PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Travis Howell v. State of Maryland No. 43, September Term 2018 Criminal Law – Duress Defense. To generate the common law defense of duress in a criminal trial, the defendant must, among other things, produce some evidence that he or she committed the crime because of a well-grounded apprehension of a “present, immediate, and impending” threat of death or serious bodily injury with no reasonable opportunity of escape. Criminal Law – Duress Defense – Exceptions. As a matter of public policy, duress is not a defense to intentional murder. The Court declined to decide whether public policy…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Leonard PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. Dykes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Piemonte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. In Re Robert Reginald KilgoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Madrid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Estate of Blair v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Mayor & City Cncl. of Balt. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  4. State v. LambCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API