Legal Opinion

State v. Lamb

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 10, 2020No. 117861Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 117,861 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DEIJAUN D. LEANNDRE LAMB, Defendant, (PATTRICK TOWNER), Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellate court should consider a case that would otherwise be moot if it (1) is of statewide interest and of the nature that public policy demands a decision, such as those issues that exonerate the defendant; (2) remains a real controversy; or (3) is capable of repetition. 2. A contempt finding for failure to testify in a case that is subsequently dismissed without prejudice is an issue subject to repetition…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Leonard PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. Shannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API