Legal Opinion

Piemonte v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 19, 1961No. 122PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

Petitioner, Armando Piemonte, while serving a six-year sentence for the sale and possession of heroin, was brought by writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum before a federal grand jury inquiring into narcotics offenses. Having consulted his counsel prior to his appearance, before the grand jury he refused to answer all questions *557concerning his crime as well as other transactions in narcotics, under the claim of his privilege against self-incrimination. Three days later, the United States Attorney petitioned for an order directing Piemonte to answer the questions put to him. The petition…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. Leonard PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. In Re MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API