Legal Opinion

Bree v. Beall

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1981No. Civ. 22042PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STANIFORTH, Acting P. J.

James Bree’s dba Cortez Development Co., Inc., (Bree) suit sought damages for breach of a subcontractor’s *654agreement from R. E. Beall Construction Co. and Richard E. Beall, individually (Beall). R. E. Beall Construction Co. (the Company) cross-complained against Bree for damages for breach of a subcontractor’s agreement and sought foreclosure of a mechanics’ lien. This dispute was by stipulation submitted to arbitration. The arbitrator’s award—entered March 15, 1979—ordered Bree, inter alia, “shall pay to Beall the sum of $11,515. . .with legal interest to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Bastajian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Interstate Brands Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Bree v. BeallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API