Legal Opinion
Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 28, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-1803PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Fleer Corporation brought this action charging the defendants with violations of the antitrust laws in connection with the production and sale of baseball trading cards and similar products. Presently before the court is the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. This motion is based on three grounds — first, that Fleer lacks standing to litigate the alleged antitrust violations; second, that the complaint alleges no act which could have injured Fleer’s business within the four year statute of limitations period; third, that the doctrine of collateral…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Ashley Creek Phosphate Co. v. Chevron USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Sanger Insurance Agency v. HUB International, LimiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- International Wood Processors v. Power Dry, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1984
- Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.