State v. Soliz
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Justice.
¶ 1 Article 2, Section 23 of the Arizona Constitution requires that “[jjuries in criminal, eases in which a sentence of ... imprisonment for thirty years or more is authorized by law shall consist of twelve persons.” In this case we consider whether this provision is violated when a sentence of thirty years or more is authorized by law for the crimes charged, the case proceeds to verdict with a jury of less than twelve people without objection, and the resulting sentence is less than thirty years.
I
¶2 The State charged Basilio Soliz with possession of dangerous drugs for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BoldingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. DiazArizona Supreme Court · 2010
- Alavez v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- LEJUNE C. SMITH v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- LEJUNE C. SMITH v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.