Legal Opinion

State v. Soliz

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 2009No. CR-09-0087-PRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Justice.

¶ 1 Article 2, Section 23 of the Arizona Constitution requires that “[jjuries in criminal, eases in which a sentence of ... imprisonment for thirty years or more is authorized by law shall consist of twelve persons.” In this case we consider whether this provision is violated when a sentence of thirty years or more is authorized by law for the crimes charged, the case proceeds to verdict with a jury of less than twelve people without objection, and the resulting sentence is less than thirty years.

I

¶2 The State charged Basilio Soliz with possession of dangerous drugs for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BoldingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. State v. DiazArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Alavez v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  4. LEJUNE C. SMITH v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. LEJUNE C. SMITH v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API