Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Bruce
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 25, 2006No. 04-3274-JTMPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MARTEN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No 82). Defendants argue that plaintiff received sufficient medical treatment for defendants to overcome plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim. Plaintiff filed an untimely response, which the court did not consider. D. Kan. R. 7.4 (noting that where a respondent fails to file a response within the time specified, the court may consider the motion uncontested and ordinarily will be granted without further notice).
At the outset, the court notes that defendants’ motion…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Mata v. SaizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bettis v. HallDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Davis v. McCarterDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Rajala v. Martin (In re Convenience Xpress, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2014
- Beddow v. RhodesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Brownlee (ID 73693) v. ClineDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.