Legal Opinion
Davis v. McCarter
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 5, 2008No. 06-3320-JARPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge.
The Court now considers defendant Brad McCarter’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40) filed on May 22, 2008. Pursuant to D. Kan. R. 6.1(d)(2) plaintiff was required to respond within twenty-three days; however, nearly two months have elapsed and plaintiff has failed to oppose the motion. For the reasons detailed below, summary judgment is granted; plaintiffs action is dismissed.
I. Uncontroverted Facts
Plaintiff brought this action against Officers Brad McCarter, Dan Geller, and the Topeka Police Department. The Topeka Police department…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scott v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- White v. Topeka, City ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020