Legal Opinion

10-Dix Building Corp. v. McDannel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1985No. 83-1314, 84-775 consPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley

In these two consolidated appeals, defendants Margaret and Leonard McDannel seek reversal of orders finding them in contempt of court and entering sanctions of default and attorney fees against them. The sanctions were imposed as a result of defendants’ refusal to comply with court orders compelling discovery. The court ordered Margaret to pay plaintiffs $40,195 in compensatory damages, $60,000 in punitive damages, and required her to forfeit four years and three months’ salary she received from two of the three corporate plaintiffs. The court, however, dismissed the claim against Leonard,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Choi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Cordeck Sales, Inc. v. Construction Systems, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Universal Casualty Co. v. LopezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Brown v. FarkasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BerkmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API