10-Dix Building Corp. v. McDannel
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley
In these two consolidated appeals, defendants Margaret and Leonard McDannel seek reversal of orders finding them in contempt of court and entering sanctions of default and attorney fees against them. The sanctions were imposed as a result of defendants’ refusal to comply with court orders compelling discovery. The court ordered Margaret to pay plaintiffs $40,195 in compensatory damages, $60,000 in punitive damages, and required her to forfeit four years and three months’ salary she received from two of the three corporate plaintiffs. The court, however, dismissed the claim against Leonard,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Choi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Cordeck Sales, Inc. v. Construction Systems, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Universal Casualty Co. v. LopezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Brown v. FarkasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BerkmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.