Commercial Life Insurance v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*475Opinion
PANELLI, J.
—We areasked to decide whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.) preempts a private cause of action brought under California Insurance Code section 790.03, subdivision (h),1 where the action asserts a claim arising from an employee benefit plan. We conclude that ERISA does preempt such an action.
Joseph V. Juliano’s employer sponsored an employee benefit plan insured by Commercial Life Insurance Company and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (collectively referred to as Commercial). It is undisputed that the plan was the type…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Gorman v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Cathey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Hughes v. Blue Cross of Northern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Duffy v. CavalierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Marshall v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.