Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided February 27, 1997No. Civil Action 96-2220PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

WILSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

The parties have asked the court to decide whether plaintiff’s counsel may interview former and current employees of defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”), outside the presence of Wal-Mart’s counsel. Both sides have briefed the issue, and we decide as follows.

Our discussion is governed by Rule 4.2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Louisiana State Bar Association. 1 The dual purposes behind Rule 4.2 are to prevent disclosure of attorney/client communications, and to protect the party from “liability-creating” statements…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marjetta Wilkinson v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. Action Air Freight, Inc. v. Pilot Air Freight Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Clinton George Blanchard and Gertrude Blanchard v. Peoples BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. Corley v. Burger King Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Olson v. Snap Products, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  2. P.T. Barnum's Nightclub v. DuhamellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. GilliamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Palmer v. Pioneer Hotel & CasinoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1998
  5. FleetBoston Robertson Stephens, Inc. v. Innovex, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API