Legal Opinion
Palmer v. Pioneer Hotel & Casino
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided August 28, 1998No. CV-N-97-399 DWH(PHA)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAGEN, District Judge.
Before the court is the magistrate judge’s comprehensive and well-reasoned recommendation (# 39) on defendant Pioneer’s motion (# 24) to disqualify plaintiffs counsel. Plaintiff has objected, raising two points: one, that the magistrate judge erred in her analysis and application of SCR 182 and two, that her sanction was excessive. On de novo review (28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)), the court finds (1) she correctly applied SCR 182 to the conduct of plaintiffs counsel and (2) the sanction imposed was fair. The recommendation is accepted in whole. Pioneer is directed…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Abrams v. Lightolier Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Carlyle S. CLINE, Appellee, v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Portsmouth Paving Corporation and R. Curtis Saunders, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dena Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd., a Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Hernandez v. GuglielmoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- Roosevelt Irrigation District v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
- Hammond v. City of Junction City, KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.