Legal Opinion

United States v. Consolidated Coal Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 6, 1976No. Crim. 2-75-97PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DUNCAN, District Judge.

The defendants, Consolidated Coal Company (hereinafter “Consol”) and eight of its agents and employees 1 are variously charged in a 172-count indictment with conspiring to defraud the government and to violate the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; 2 with knowingly making false statements and representations in “mine data cards” filed with the Department of the Interior in violation of 30 U.S.C. § 819(d); 3 with willfully violating specified mandatory health standards in violation of 30 U.S.C. § 819(b); 4 and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. United States v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Willis K. Baker, Jr., and Mervin "Bud" Cornelsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. Sherpix, Inc., United States of America v. Louis K. SherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. G. Cecil Hartley, Travis Dell and Treasure Isle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Landmark Savings & Loan v. RhoadesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  3. Mauriber v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  4. McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
  5. F.E.L. Publications, Ltd. v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, and F.E.L. Publications, Ltd. v. Catholic Bishop of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API