Legal Opinion

Landmark Savings & Loan v. Rhoades

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 20, 1981No. Civ. 79-72799PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHURCHILL, District Judge.

As authorized by the Court, the plaintiff has filed an amended complaint for damages for violation of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77a et seq.; the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a et seq.; Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b5 (1981); the 1970 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq.; and certain pendent state claims.

The essential differences between the original complaint and the amended complaint are as follows:(1) In the amended complaint the plaintiff has enumerated with some degree of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
Parnes v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
Schacht v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.