Legal Opinion
Olivo v. Mapp
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided December 10, 1993No. 2:93cv946PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CLARKE, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Jose Olivo (“Olivo”) filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the defendants, Sheriff David K. Mapp (“Sheriff Mapp”) and the City of Norfolk (“the City”) violated his constitutional rights under color of state law. The matter is presently before the court on the City’s Motion for Summary Judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED.
I.BACKGROUND
A. General Facts
At the time the events in this matter occurred, Olivo was a Deputy Sheriff in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Robert Dale Strickler v. Gary Waters, Sheriff Commonwealth of Virginia City of Portsmouth Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blankenship v. Warren County, Va.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1996
- Brickey v. County of Smyth, Va.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1996
- Keathley v. VitaleDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994