Columbus Line, Inc. v. Gray Line Sight-Seeing Companies Associated, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, J.
Columbus Line, Inc. and Royal Viking Line, Inc. appeal from summary judgment entered against them and in favor of Gray Line Sight-Seeing Companies Associated, Inc. on their cross-complaint for equitable indemnity in a personal injury action.
That action rose out of the following circumstances. Royal Viking is the owner of the M.S. Viking Sea, a passenger vessel. Columbus and Royal Viking entered into a written agreement whereby Columbus agreed to create, manage and operate shore excursions for Royal Viking’s gulf stream cruise passengers. On October 30, 1974, Fred Lawrence and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Levy v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Parker v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Supreme Court · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Munoz v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Bostick v. Flex Equip. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jones v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Ceresino v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Sutton v. Golden Gate BridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.