Banks v. Flint
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Yell Circuit Court in Chancery, Dardanelle District. G. S. Cunningham, Judge. The proof shows that the Corbin Banking Company, Ocobock and Hall & Carter were all the agents of the New England Mortgage Security Company, and that the banking company and security company were jointly interested in placing the loans.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from Yell Circuit Court in Chancery, Dardanelle District. G. S. Cunningham, Judge. The proof shows that the Corbin Banking Company, Ocobock and Hall & Carter were all the agents of the New England Mortgage Security Company, and that the banking company and security company were jointly interested in placing the loans. Ocobock is the same person who figures in the Nebraska cases cited below. 13 Neb., 553, 556; 11 Neb., 488; 13 id., 151-7; 14 ¿¿.,91; 15 id., 335. The acts of an agent and his knowledge, within the scope •of the agency, bind the principal. Field on Corp., sec 184. 204;…
1Opinion of the CourtHemingway, J.
The appellee, Charles L. Flint, on the 24th of September, 1888, filed his complaint in the Yell circuit court against the appellant, Hardy M. Banks, seeking to foreclose a mortgage executed by the latter. It was alleged in the complaint that the appellant executed the mortgage on the xóth day of February, 1883, to secure the payment of six notes executed by him on that day to the New England Mortgage Security Company, one for one thousand dollars, payable in five years, and the others payable annually, representing the interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum. That the two…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Brown v. Lasalle ArcherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Eldred v. HartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- McLean v. FickeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Bell v. Riggs Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- American Inv. Co. v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.