Legal Opinion

Manly Manufacturing Co. v. Broaddus

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 15, 1897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Page county, pronounced November 5, 1896, in a suit in chancery wherein the appellees were the complainants, and the appellant and others were the defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The decree appealed from in this case was rendered in a cause in which Andrew Broaddus and R. S. Pams, residents and tax-pavers of Page county, suiug for themselves and other tax-payers, are plaintiffs, and the Manly Manufacturing Company, of Dalton, Gfa., John W. Rothgeb, A. JET. Keyser, H. O. Knicely, and G-. T. Brubaker, who are described as members of the board of supervisors of Page county, are defendants.

The bill charges that the board of supervisors of Page county contracted with the Manly Manufacturing Company for the construction of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stewart & Palmer v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. County of Campbell v. HowardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  2. Johnson v. BlackSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  3. Hutchinson v. KruegerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Phillips v. Rector & Visitors of the University of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  5. County School Board v. First National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API