Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Poole

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1964No. 385PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Defendant excepted to and assigns as error the denial of his motion for judgment of nonsuit. He asserts, as the sole basis for his position, that the uncontroverted facts show plaintiff’s action is barred by the statute of limitations.

The statutory provision pleaded and relied on by defendant is G.S. 1-47(1). It provides that the period prescribed for the commencement of an action “(u)pon a judgment or decree of any court of the United States, or of any state or territory thereof,” is ten years “from the date of its rendition.”

Plaintiff’s action, instituted May 10, 1963, is based on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Letterlough v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Clark v. GASTONIA ICE CREAM COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. In Re Chisholm's WillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. Wayne Dennis Heating & Air ConditioningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. WessonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API