Hinsman v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Carrollton— Judge Beall. January 26, 1914.
1Opinion of the CourtBoan, J.
1. Byron Hinsman was convicted of the offense of selling intoxicating liquor, and he excepts to the refusal of a new trial. The usual general grounds of the motion for a new trial are followed by this ground: “Because in the argument of the solicitor before the jury he used the following language: ‘These blind tigers aré running around over the county, sending souls to hell, having no respect for your homes, and you ought to stop that kind of stuff. The good people of Boopville are all talking about it, and they are trying to put down these blind tigers, and I ask you to help me convict…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lasseter v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Manning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Munro v. Moody & FrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hawthorne v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Ware v. LamarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916