Ware v. Lamar
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action, for damages; from city court of Atlanta — Judge Eeid. April 13, 1916.
1Opinion of the Court
Wade, O. J.
1. There was evidence to support a finding in behalf of the plaintiff, and the verdict for $2,000 for the loss of an eye was not excessive.
2. The grounds of the motion for a new trial relating to newly discovered evidence of certain witnesses are without merit. So far as appears there was no attempt to comply with the requirement of the statute, that “If newly discovered evidence [urged as a ground for a new trial! is that of witnesses, affidavits as to their residence, associates, means of knowledge, character, and credibility must be adduced.” Civil Code, § 6086. Barnum & Bailey…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. GlawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Griggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Ware v. LamarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Corbin v. McCraryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Moye v. ReddickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Faggart v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Southern Railway Co. v. RayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922