Legal Opinion

Munro v. Moody & Fry

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 26, 1887PublishedCited by 14 opinions

New Trial. Perjury. Evidence. Before Judge Bower. Decatur Superior Court. May Term, 1886. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

Moody & Fry sued Munro, as surviving partner of Munro, Clary & Co., to recover the value of a raft of timber which the plaintiffs alleged belonged to them, and which they had sold to the defendants, to be paid for when it should be delivered at Apalachicola. The defendants also had other timber, which they had themselves cut and prepared from the forest, and which they contended formed this raft. The issue submitted was as to the identity of this timber; and upon that point the evidence was conflicting. The jury found that it was the plaintiffs’ timber, and a motion was made for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. SketoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  2. Richardson v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vining v. American Bakeries Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Hutchings v. RoquemoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Norwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  4. Gregory v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API