United States v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Kurt F. Johnson and Dale Scott Heineman were indicted for conspiracy and multiple counts of mail fraud related to their illegitimate debt-elimination business. They were adamant in their desire to represent themselves and assert an absurd legal theory wrapped up in Uniform Commercial Code gibberish. Both defendants were examined by a psychiatrist and found to have no diagnosable mental disorder. Thereafter, the district court conducted Faretta 1 hearings spanning several days in which the defendants were extensively advised of their right to counsel…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- United States v. Denard NealCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Perry v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Luke BrugnaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. MikhelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Steven AudetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.