Legal Opinion

Sohroeder v. Lahrman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in ej'eetment commenced in the district court for Scott county. Upon a trial by the court, Macdonald, J., presiding, judgment was entered for defendant, and plaintiff appealed. upon the point that a tender of the amount due to the sheriff, within the time for redemption, operated to extinguish the lien, cited Caruthers v. Humphrey, 12 Mich. 270; Moynahan v. Moore, 9 Mich. 9; Kortright v. Cady, 21 N. Y. 343; Breitenbach v. Turner, 18 Wis. 148; Moore v. Cord, 14 Wis.…

Read the full summary

Action in ej'eetment commenced in the district court for Scott county. Upon a trial by the court, Macdonald, J., presiding, judgment was entered for defendant, and plaintiff appealed. upon the point that a tender of the amount due to the sheriff, within the time for redemption, operated to extinguish the lien, cited Caruthers v. Humphrey, 12 Mich. 270; Moynahan v. Moore, 9 Mich. 9; Kortright v. Cady, 21 N. Y. 343; Breitenbach v. Turner, 18 Wis. 148; Moore v. Cord, 14 Wis. 231; Ladue v. Detroit é M. R. R. Co., 13 Mich. 380; Newton v. Sly, 15 Mich. 391; Hoggsett v. Ellis, 17 Mich. 351; Humphrey…

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is an action in ejectment. The defendant in her answer denies the title of plaintiff, and alleges title in herself. Both parties claim title under one Fegebank, — the plaintiff, under a mortgage upon the premises executed by Fegebank in 1863, and afterwards duly foreclosed, and the premises sold thereunder April 25, 1867, to plaintiff’s grantor; the defendant, under a conveyance by Fegebank, subsequent to the mortgage. On the 7th of April, 1868, *76defendant tendered to the then sheriff of the county in which the premises are situated the sum necessary to redeem from the mortgage sale. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horton v. MaffittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  2. Tinkcom v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  3. Gilchrist v. . ComfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Davis v. SeymourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. Mona Motor Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Abraham v. HollowaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. United States v. Dairy Farm Leasing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
  4. Cheney v. BengtsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API