Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Bowden)

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1976No. Civ. 48631PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON, J.

Introduction

The People seek a statutory writ of mandate pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5, subdivision (o), to compel the superior court to deny real parties in interest's motions to suppress evidence which was seized in a garage adjacent to defendant Bowden’s home without a search or arrest warrant. The superior court, following a full de novo hearing, had granted defendants’ motions to suppress the evidence upon the basis that as a matter of law the police had no authority to order the five defendants (real parties in interest) from the garage after accepting as true…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Lorenzana v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. BlodgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Irwin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MacKCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. LloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. People v. AbesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. CoffeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API