People v. Coffee
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COMPTON, J.
Defendants Coffee and Shirley Faye James pleaded guilty to the crime of first degree robbery. Coffee admitted to an allegation that he had used a firearm in the commission of the offense.
As a part of a plea bargain, an allegation that defendant Coffee had suffered two prior felony convictions for burglary and grand theft from the person, were struck from the information. As to defendant James, the allegation of use of a firearm was struck as was an allegation that she had suffered prior convictions for burglary and aiding and abetting a bank robbery. It also appears that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. RameyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. BlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. EscuderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. SommerhalderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. McGriffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. CelisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981