Legal Opinion

People v. Coffee

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1980No. Docket Nos. 35724, 35356PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, J.

Defendants Coffee and Shirley Faye James pleaded guilty to the crime of first degree robbery. Coffee admitted to an allegation that he had used a firearm in the commission of the offense.

As a part of a plea bargain, an allegation that defendant Coffee had suffered two prior felony convictions for burglary and grand theft from the person, were struck from the information. As to defendant James, the allegation of use of a firearm was struck as was an allegation that she had suffered prior convictions for burglary and aiding and abetting a bank robbery. It also appears that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. People v. RameyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. BlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. EscuderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. SommerhalderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. McGriffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. People v. CelisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API