Legal Opinion

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1961No. Civ. No. 19538PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a declaratory judgment holding that plaintiff (1) “has a valid, subsisting and existing franchise from the State of California under Public Utilities Code Section 7901 [Civ. Code, § 536; Stats. 1905, p. 492]1 to construct and maintain telephone lines in all the streets and other public places under the jurisdiction of the City and County of San Francisco” and (2) that “Defendant cannot require plaintiff to obtain a franchise from or pay franchise compensation to defendant for the right to construct and maintain telephone lines in any of the public streets or other…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DuelSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. South Dakota Ex Rel. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of BerkeleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
  3. T-Mobile West LLC v. City and County of S.F.California Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Ponce v. Tractor Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API