Legal Opinion
Bareham v. City of Rochester
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
In reliance upon the authority to be found in the City Home Rule Law (Laws of 1924, chap. 363 as amd., entitled “ An Act enabling cities to adopt and amend local laws * * *”), the common council of the city of Rochester has proposed, and a referendum has approved, amendments to its charter, both by way of repeal and addition, to take effect January 1, 1928. The City Home Rule Law was passed by the Legislature by virtue of the Home Rule Amendment to the State Constitution (Art. 12, §§ 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) and approved by the people at the general election held November 6, 1923. In effect the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Matter of McCabe v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- People Ex Rel. Killeen v. . AngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- People Ex Rel. Devery v. . ColerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. . AhearnNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roth v. CuevasNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Smith & Son, Inc. v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- People v. KearseSyracuse City Court · 1968
- Bareham v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Hammer v. CurranNew York Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.