Bareham v. City of Rochester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The city of Rochester has for some time been governed under a “ federal plan ” charter (Laws of 1907, chap. 755, and amendments). The people elected most of the city officers; a certain number were appointed by the mayor. Amendatory of, and supplementary to, this charter, a “ local law ” has been passed by the common council of the city, and the electors acted upon it favorably in November, 1925. It provides for the election on petition of a non-partisan common council of nine members, five of them elected at large, and one from each of four constituted districts. The common council appoints…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schieffelin v. Valentine KomfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Matter of McCabe v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Rathbone v. . WirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Western New York Water Co. v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Browne v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roth v. CuevasNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. KearseSyracuse City Court · 1968
- Pratter v. LascoffNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Hammer v. CurranNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.