Legal Opinion

Butler v. Ungerleider

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 16, 1951No. 21883_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

187 F.2d 238

BUTLER,

v.

UNGERLEIDER.

No. 156, Docket 21883.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 9, 1951.

Decided Feb. 16, 1951.

William A. Butler, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Vine H. Smith, Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Morton Frederick, New York City, for defendant-appellee.

Plaintiff Butler's complaint alleges the following: On January 23, 1933, one Schumacher, as receiver of a national bank, recovered a judgment against Butler in the court below on an alleged obligation of Butler for an assessment against him as alleged shareholder of the bank. Butler was not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Pacific Railroad of Missouri v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. And Others. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Minnesota Co. v. St. Paul Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1865
  5. Dunn v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1834

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API