Legal Opinion

Minnesota Co. v. St. Paul Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 10, 1865PublishedCited by 105 opinions

The La Crosse and Milwaukie Railroad Company was chartered by the legislature of Wisconsin to build a road across that State from Milwaukie to La Crosse, and began. to build at Milwaukie, proceeding westward. The legislature also gave the company the right to mortgage, for the purpose of raising money, any particular division of their road separately.

Read the full summary

The La Crosse and Milwaukie Railroad Company was chartered by the legislature of Wisconsin to build a road across that State from Milwaukie to La Crosse, and began. to build at Milwaukie, proceeding westward. The legislature also gave the company the right to mortgage, for the purpose of raising money, any particular division of their road separately. Under this provision of the statute, and for the purpose apparently of mortgaging them separately, the company divided the main road into two divisions, nearly equal in length, called the Eastern Division and the "Western Division; the Eastern…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

The first question raised by the demurrer relates to juris diction.

*634. For tbe purposes of this question we are to take the facts set up by the bill [his Honor had stated the main ones] and demurred to, as true, and consider whether they make a case for the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of the District of "Wisconsin, which’ has become successor of the District Court in that district.

The present suit grows immediately out of and is a necessity which arises from the suri, by Bronson, Soutter, and Knapp, to foreclose the Land Grant mortgage; under the decree in which suit the Western Division…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Randall v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Delaplaine v. LawrenceNew York Court of Chancery · 1844

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API