Christner v. ANDERSON, NIETZKE & COMPANY, PC
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.
We are asked to determine whether the Court of Appeals properly applied principles of equity to reduce plaintiff’s damages under two contracts with defendant Anderson, Nietzke & Company, Inc., a professional corporation which began the process of dissolution shortly after plaintiff commenced this action. In addition, defendants have filed a cross-claim contending that plaintiff, a shareholder and director in the firm, should not be allowed to maintain this individual action and that the Court of Appeals erred in holding the defendant directors of the corporation individually liable for breach…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Michigan Medical Service v. SharpeMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Christner v. ANDERSON, NIETZKE & COMPANY, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Allied Supermarkets, Inc. v. GROCER'S DAIRY. CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Curylo v. CuryloMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- City of Muskegon v. Amec, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by22 opinions
- Prysak v. R L Polk Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,561 in Re Van Dresser Corporation, Debtor. Daniel M. Honigman v. Comerica Bank Grant A. Friley, III Wilma BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Trieweiler Ex Rel. Varsity Investments, Inc. v. SearsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Scd Chemical Distributors, Inc v. MedleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Tata Consultancy Services, a Division of Tata Sons Ltd. v. Systems International, Inc., D/B/A Syntel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.