Legal Opinion

Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. Barnhill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 17, 1984No. 84-178PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The plaintiff below, A.H. Barnhill, Jr., had a liability insurance policy issued by Farm Bureau, covering Barnhill’s four cars. The policy provided that its terms applied separately to each vehicle. Barnhill was seriously injured in a collision with an uninsured motorist. The policy contained the required minimum uninsured-motorist coverage of $10,000.

Barnhill brought this suit for a declaratory judgment permitting him to stack the four coverages, so that he could recover up to $40,000 to apply to his damages. The circuit court held that the policy did not allow…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MFA Mutual Ins. Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Woolston v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1969
  3. Dugal v. Commercial Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1978
  4. Barnhill v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ross v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Nielsen v. O'REILLYUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Nielsen v. O'REILLYUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ross v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API