Legal Opinion

Nielsen v. O'REILLY

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1992No. 900489Published

1Opinion of the Court

848 P.2d 664 (1993)

Richard H. NIELSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Mark O'REILLY, Linda R. French, and Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance Co., Defendants and Appellees.

No. 900489.

Supreme Court of Utah.

November 13, 1992.

Rehearing Denied March 8, 1993.

L. Rich Humphreys, Karra J. Porter, Salt Lake City, for Richard Nielsen.

Glenn C. Hanni, Barbara L. Maw, Salt Lake City, for Metropolitan Property.

HALL, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff Richard H. Nielsen appeals the judgment of the Third Judicial District Court that $250,000 is the maximum recovery possible under the uninsured motorist provision of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Sellers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
  4. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API