Legal Opinion

Vandemark v. Southland Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1988No. 87-714PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The defendant-appellant contends that plaintiff has failed to state a claim for relief, and that under Greenwalt, supra, the injured employee is solely responsible for the filing of his workers’ compensation claim. Defendant submits that the instant action is barred under R.C. 4123.84 by the lapse of more than two years from the date of the injury.

Plaintiff-appellee argues that defendant, as a self-insured employer,1 was ultimately responsible for the submission of his claim to the bureau under former Ohio Adm. Code 4121-9-03(K), once plaintiff had submitted his claim to the employer.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Velotta v. Leo Petronzio Landscaping, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Warnke v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  2. Davis v. WidmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Rogers v. Targot Telemarketing ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Dibert v. Watson, 8-09-02 (5-4-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Daley v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API