Legal Opinion

Caplan v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1953No. Appeal, 254PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

This is an action to quiet title to real estate under the provisions of Rule 1061 (b) (2) and (3) of Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. The alleged cloud relates to a clause in the deed to plaintiff’s predecessor in title. The court below overruled preliminary objections to defendant’s answer and new matter and dismissed the complaint. This appeal followed.

The City of Pittsburgh, the defendant, acquired title at a tax sale to 819 Fifth Avenue in that city. After the period of redemption had expired the city sold the premises to Solomon Caplan, father…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. Beaver FallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Warren's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. DeSanno v. EarleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Moorre v. Stevens Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Atherton v. Clearview Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lyncott Corp. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Barnhart v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Logston v. Penndale, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Hartzfeld v. Green Glen Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API