Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Barnhart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1954No. Appeals, 180, 181, 198 and 199PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Steabne,

The two questions presented by these appeals in a partition proceeding are (1) whether or not papers executed by an heir constitute a conveyance of his interest in named real estate and (2) whether or not a husband of an heir has released his interest in his deceased wife’s estate. The court below decided that the heir had conveyed his interest in the real estate, but that the husband of the deceased wife had not released his interest in her estate. The appeals followed.

Robert L. Barnhart died intestate May 20, 1924, seized of real estate in Charleroi,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rynier EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. McClellan EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Conrad's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. McCready's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Caplan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kaufmann EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Community Sports, Inc. v. Denver Ringsby Rockets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Thomas v. First Nat. Bank of ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Newman v. SabloskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Socko v. Mid-Atlantic Systems of CPA, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API