Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Pure Oil Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 12, 1937PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jayne, S. C. O.
This motion is addressed to the complaint. The reason assigned in support of the motion is that the complaint fails to allege a cause of action. In the consideration of a motion of this nature all of the facts adequately alleged in the complaint must be accepted as true, 'as well as all inferences of fact which can be logically and *724legitimately drawn from them. Crawford v. Winterbottom, 88 N. J. L. 588; 96 Atl. Rep. 497; Koewing v. West Orange, 89 N. J. L. 539; 99 Atl. Rep. 203. Such a motion under modern practice (Supreme Court rule 40) has merely been substituted for the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Meiers v. Fred Koch BreweryNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Hammond v. County of MonmouthSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Smith v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
- Pinson v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Maloney v. Hearst Hotels CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anderson v. CinnamonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CrouchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
- Jackson v. Velveray Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Shypulski v. Waldorf Paper Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Petrone v. MargolisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.