Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Howard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1974No. 7426SC627PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Rule 54 (b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54 (b), is as follows:

“ (b) Judgment upon multiple claims or involving multiple parties. — When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may enter a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only if there is no just reason for delay and it is so determined in the judgment. Such judgment shall then be subject to review by appeal or as otherwise provided…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Equitable Leasing Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Narron v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. NYTCO LEASING, INC. v. Dan-Cleve CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Pasour v. PierceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API