Legal Opinion

Pasour v. Pierce

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1980No. 7927SC988PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Ordinarily, the allowance of a motion to dismiss is immediately appealable. This case, however, obviously involves multiple defendants, and the Order granting the City’s motion to dismiss purports to dispose of the case as to that defendant only. G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 54(b), provides in pertinent part:

Judgment upon multiple claims or involving multiple parties. — When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, ... or when multiple parties are involved, the court may enter a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only if there is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Equitable Leasing Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Arnold v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. MORTGAGE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Richmond County Board of Education v. CowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. ShoffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Thompson v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Casey v. GriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API