Legal Opinion

Bialochowski v. CROSS CONCRETE PUMPING CO.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1985No. Docket 74243PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Reliance Insurance Company appeals as of right from the grant of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, GCR 1963, 117.2(1). The trial judge held that Reliance, as plaintiff’s workers’ compensation carrier who had paid medical benefits, was not entitled to share in plaintiffs recovery from a third-party tortfeasor.

Plaintiff was severely injured in an accident on a construction site. A pump malfunctioned, causing a 30-foot boom carrying concrete to collapse from a height of 20 feet. The collapsing boom crushed him. The boom and pump were permanently attached to a large concrete…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great American Insurance v. QueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pelkey v. Elsea Realty & Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Johnston v. Hartford InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Keys v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bialochowski v. Cross Concrete Pumping Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ryan v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Wieringa v. Blue Care NetworkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Mason v. ScarpuzzaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Schuster v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API