Robison v. Jones
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.
As is increasingly the case in modern-day litigation the Court once again is called upon to determine whether there is a genuine issue as to any material fact, or whether a party is entitled to a summary judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A.1 In the instant action the defendants have moved for summary judgment upon two principal grounds: (1) that the action is barred by the statute of limitations, and (2) that the action is barred by res judicata. Plaintiff vigorously denies that defendants are entitled to a summary judgment in their favor.
S…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.