Legal Opinion

Robison v. Jones

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided February 4, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 364Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.

As is increasingly the case in modern-day litigation the Court once again is called upon to determine whether there is a genuine issue as to any material fact, or whether a party is entitled to a summary judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A.1 In the instant action the defendants have moved for summary judgment upon two principal grounds: (1) that the action is barred by the statute of limitations, and (2) that the action is barred by res judicata. Plaintiff vigorously denies that defendants are entitled to a summary judgment in their favor.

S…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API