Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Stanley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 28, 1989No. 2-89-091-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEYERS, Judge.

Appellees Dorothy Louise Stanley, Glenda Jean Briscoe, William Allen Stanley, Jr., Rhonda Athey, and Janice Gillman (plaintiffs below), pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 49, sought leave of this court, to review the sufficiency of the supersedeas bond set by the trial court. As we find no evidence that posting the supersedeas bond in full will irreparably harm appellants, the reduction privilege afforded by TEX.R.APP.P. 47(b) is not available to appellants. We therefore find the supersedeas bond now set is insufficient and order an additional bond in an amount that, combined with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miami International Realty Co. v. Richard Paynter and Paynter & Hensick, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. Culbertson v. BrodskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API