Culbertson v. Brodsky
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
FARRIS, Justice.
Appellants Culbertsons have filed a motion for review of the trial court’s order setting the amount of supersedeas bond, complaining that it is excessive. See TEX. R.APP.P. 49(b). Culbertsons are appealing a judgment awarding appellee Brodsky, as grantee, specific performance of a real estate sales contract, $140,000 in attorney’s fees, and costs. The trial court set Cul-bertsons’ supersedeas bond at $588,400. The Culbertsons allege that they cannot post bond in the amount ordered by the court and if compelled to do so, will suffer irreparable injury. They…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, State of Texas, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Joy v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Bachman v. NealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hughes v. Habitat Apartments, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Harvey v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Hibernia Energy III, LLC v. Ferae Naturae, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2022
- Joan Gottlieb Mendell v. Laurence Scott and Rachel Chaput, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2022
- Reyes v. Credit Based Asset Servicing & Securitization Ex Rel. Pledged Property II LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.