Miami International Realty Co. v. Richard Paynter and Paynter & Hensick, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(c). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Miami International Realty Company (Miami), appeals from an order of the district court staying execution of a judgment pending appeal. In this appeal, we are asked to review under what circumstances, if any, may a stay be granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Proc. Rule 69, 28…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Poplar Grove Planting and Refining Co., Inc. v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, State of Texas, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- C. Albert Sauter Co., Inc. v. Richard S. Sauter Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States v. KurtzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Association, William S. Apple Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Edmund A. Rachel, AKA Peter Rachel, D/B/A Wildlife Interiors, Plaintiff v. Banana Republic, Inc., Fisher Development, Inc., and the Gap, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Olcott v. Delaware Flood Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Republic of PalauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Avirgan v. HullDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
- Metz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.