Legal Opinion

Lyles v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 8, 1996No. 439PA95PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*679WEBB, Justice.

The Court of Appeals based its decision on its holding that the City of Charlotte had waived its sovereign immunity by participating in a local government risk pool. N.C.G.S. § 160A-485 provides that a city may waive its sovereign immunity for civil liability in tort by purchasing liability insurance or by participating in a local government risk pool pursuant to article 23 of General Statutes chapter 58. N.C.G.S. § 58-23-5 provides in part:

In addition to other authority granted pursuant to Chapters 153A and 160A of the General Statutes, two or more local governments may enter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. StoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Blackwelder v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Glenn-Robinson v. AckerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Schlossberg v. GoinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Houpe v. City of StatesvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Pettiford v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
  5. Brinkman v. Barrett Kays & Associates, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API