Legal Opinion

Winslow v. Carolina Conference Ass'n of the Seventh Day Adventists

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

A careful study of the provisions of the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act (chapter 120, Public Laws of North Carolina, 1929, as amended, chapter 133-A, N. 0. Code of 1935), shows that it was the purpose of the General Assembly of this State, in providing for compensation for an employee who has suffered an injury, or for the dependents of an employee who has suffered death, by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, without fault on the part of the employer, where both the employee and the employer have *579accepted the provisions of the act, and are therefore hound…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stertz v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Bryson v. Gloucester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Hardison v. W. H. Hampton & SonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Williams v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chaisson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Wade v. Carolina Brush Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Mohawk Rubber Co. v. BufordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Strezinski v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Egen v. Excalibur Resort ProfessionalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API