Williams v. . Thompson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The defendants contend: Was there sufficient evidence to sustain the finding of fact by the Industrial Commission that plaintiff’s injury, to wit, the loss of vision occasioned by gonorrhea oph-thalmia, resulted naturally and unavoidably from the dropping of gasoline into his eye?
Public Laws of North Carolina, 1929, ch. 120, known as the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act, sec. 2(f), is as follows: “Un-jury’ and ‘personal injury’ shall mean only injury by accident arising out of, and in the course of, the employment, and shall not include a disease in any form, except where it results…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Gilmore v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Gilmore v. Hoke County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Aycock v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Doggett v. South Atlantic Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Winslow v. . Carolina Conference AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.